Lifting the Lid on Milk Hill

Posted by on May 5, 2012

Milk Hill phase 1, 6th July 2011

Fig.1 - Milk Hill phase 1, 6th July 2011

Hindsight, of course, is the most accurate of sciences. When writing about the Honey Street Lobsters formation I said, talking about two-stage formations, “after every phase, the design seems considered, poised and finished in its own right. There is rarely a sense that the formation is incomplete and awaiting an addition or expansion.”

I was wrong. The beautiful Milk Hill formation of 6th July (just one mile north of the Lobsters and just one day after the lobsters second hit) was deliciously expectant from the moment it arrived. [Fig.1] It was not just me. Many people sensed that a transformation or addition was imminent.

But I felt sure that there was something brewing at Milk Hill. I sensed too many clues, too many loose ends. The large central disc with the small circle in the middle seemed powerfully to suggest a lid. The small circle seemed like the finger hole in the lid to help lift it off and open it up.

To reveal what? The three points could have been laundry items peeping out from under a lid. But the clues they gave us were clear. It was obvious that the three “ears” were made of the ends of arcs that connected to form a surprise pattern. Those arcs were the same diameter as the outer ring of the formation.

The Triquetra

Fig.2 - The Triquetra

I assumed, hopefully and naively, that a triquetra [Fig.2] would be exposed. This mysterious and multi-layered symbol has many meanings. It is a form which can be drawn without lifting pencil off paper thus implying continuity. It might be a union of three vesicas or it could be an amplified and extended infinity symbol. Certainly it formed what could be called an endless Celtic Knot.

But realistically Phase 1 had already shown us that the continuity of the metaphorical string was broken at each of the three corners. Figure [Fig.3] shows an attempt to make as complete a triquetra as possible. The centre bears a strange resemblance to the Barbury Castle three moons formation [Fig.4] of 23rd July 1999. Barbury Castle shows how simply and convincingly the crop circles can depict overlay and underlay.

The imagined Triquetra under the lid

Fig.3 - The imagined Triquetra under the lid

Barbury Castle 3 Moons, 23rd July 1999

Fig.4 - Barbury Castle 3 Moons, 23rd July 1999

When Phase 2 arrived and the lid was lifted, something entirely unpredictable and unforeseen was revealed [Fig.5]. The central area is an unusual pattern made of three swirling Vs [Fig.6]. The inner wings of each V are as shown in diagram [3] while each of the outer wings is a part of a newly created inner ring, exactly the size of the removed “lid”.

Milk Hill phase 2, 7th July 2011

Fig.5 - Milk Hill phase 2

Milk Hill phase 2 centre

Fig.6 - Milk Hill phase 2 centre

I am very impressed by this new 3Vs symbol but, as so often is the case, I can offer no real clarification as to its meaning or importance.

THE STANTON ST BERNARD CELTIC WEAVE
The Milk Hill formation very nearly shared its birthday with the Honey Street crop circle. The two were linked by the fact that they were both two-phase formations but also by geography; they were just over a mile apart.

Stanton St Bernard, 14th August 1999

Fig.7 - Stanton St Bernard, 14th August 1999

Almost exactly the same distance away, not to the south but the southwest, is the Stanton St Bernard field, which received, on 14th August 1999, the formation known as the Celtic Knot [Fig.7]. This was not a two-phase formation although the photograph shows three separate elements. The connection is that both Milk Hill and Stanton embody broadly Celtic knotting, weaving or overlapping and indeed the Stanton formation is by far the best example we have ever had of a graphic weave design. This formation was little visited and, I believe, unpublished.

The central complex element [Fig.8] is flanked, on the one side, by a large two and a quarter turn spiral and, on the other side, a flattened circle with a short spiral tail. It is the central woven element that is of most interest.

The ground shot [Fig.9] is evidence that the complex interwoven design was even less comprehensible in the field. At the time I was particularly interested in two aspects of the phenomenon: the pathway/twisted ribbon/rope themes that were starting to develop and the closely related topic, the maze and labyrinth pattern. The Stanton St Bernard formation related powerfully to both of these subjects.

Stanton St Bernard central weave

Fig.8 - Stanton St Bernard central weave

Stanton St Bernard ground shot

Fig.9 - Stanton St Bernard ground shot

The maze is a convoluted system with many bogus corners and dead ends. It stimulates the left, reasoning side of the brain. The labyrinth is single-pathed or unicursal. It leads simply from beginning to end with no false turnings. It exercises the right, meditative hemisphere.

Stanton St Bernard idealised diagram

Fig.10 - Stanton St Bernard idealised diagram

There was no proper survey of the woven central element but from the photographs I produced an idealised drawing [Fig.10] that depicts the intricate layout of the pathways. My intention was to clarify the maze or labyrinth question.

I discovered that there were in fact three separate path systems, shown in colour in Diagram [Fig.11]. The first, in blue, is a loop without beginning or end. It is difficult not to interpret this as a phallic symbol. The green has two ends at the base and forms a simple column with a strange gothic point on top. The pink is the most complex showing a true weave pattern of warp and weft. These crossing points read as a kind of bridge in which the underpass and the flyover are simply but clearly graphically displayed. In the Stanton St Bernard formation, which is more a Celtic Weave than a Celtic Knot, there are 29 of these bridges or crossing points.

Stanton St Bernard coloured diagram

Fig.11 - Stanton St Bernard coloured diagram


Which leads to the Bishops Cannings formation of 6th August 1999 [Fig.12]. This was an exemplary seven-fold crop circle which many call the Basket because of the astonishing interweave of the laid crop. Look closely at the weave between the rings on the aerial shot and then compare with the robust surge on the ground from which it was made [Fig.13]. To transform the bold and vigorous system in the field into an exemplary woven texture when seen from the air requires a profound understanding of light, shade, scale and form. What kind of intelligence could pull this off?

Bishops Cannings, 6th August 1999

Fig.12 - Bishops Cannings, 6th August 1999

Bishops Cannings

Fig.13 - Bishops Cannings

Bishops Cannings landed just over a week before and about five miles west of Stanton St Bernard. The woven ground lay of the Bishops Cannings crop circle has never been equalled. Stanton St Bernard’s graphic depiction of a weave pattern remains unsurpassed. Stanton’s weave embodied 29 bridges. The Bishops Cannings formation contained 29 circles.

Acknowledgements and thanks
Photography: Steve Alexander, Ulrich Kox, Olivier Morel, Andreas Muller, Patricia Murray
Diagrams and graphics: Michael Glickman, Ofmil Haynes Jr

9 Comments

  1. Very nice how you openly weave, tie and knot all these formations together over Time, while at the very same time open new insight and connection to these communications.

  2. I did not know that any close-ups had been obtained of the basket formation at Bishops Cannings. Are there any others?

    Mr. Glickman, your website, writing, and insights are wonderful. Thank you.

  3. Thank you Michael for creating this beautiful website, AS always, I’m impressed with you and your enthusiasm and delight with the crop formations. It was a pleasure to have met you in 2009 for Tea with Denni Clarke. I keep in contact with her and I have 5 of your posters sharing my art studio and bedroom.
    love and light,
    Jody Royée

  4. You are much missed in Santa Monica but its wonderful to find you alive and kicking on your own web site in the wilds of Wiltshire.

  5. Wish you a lot of traffic on this site … I’m pretty sure – soon you’ll be called Michael Clickman. Much thanx for your work!
    Wolfgang

  6. Dear Michael,

    What a delight to find your website today! I look forward to what you will be saying about the June 9/12 formation.

    With best wishes for your endeavors,

    Laara

  7. Hello Michael,

    “One could say the labyrinth is arab calligraphy.”
    Fath (from Belgium)
    Allah

  8. Michael, how delightful and inspiring to get in touch with your thinking on the circles once more.
    My friends, the Thomases, are here with me in France and we shall certainly look at the site together.
    best wishes, Paul

  9. Nice to understand this from a point of view based on art. So what these people are saying is look at my artwork? Is there a deeper disclosure? I am not getting the message of why the aliens would go to such extremes to impress upon us their artistic nature. Eventually or currently are they sending us other messages?